15 March 2008
On 8th March, representatives of social, environmental and community organisations from the three main pineapple growing areas of Costa Rica – the world's number one exporter – met in La Perla de Guácimo and formed the first national coalition to try and halt the serious damage being done by industrial pineapple expansion in these areas.
For the first time, the government has agreed to close a pineapple plantation because of pollution of drinking water. Despite appeals by the company, the plantation is scheduled to be closed on 5th April 2008.
A few facts on the pineapple boom and its consequences
1) The model of industrial pineapple plantations has consequences for
the environmental, society and workers' rights: the destruction of
forest and water pollution; excessively long working days which do not
allow workers to do more than live to work in the pineapple plantation,
unable to have a family life or play a role in their community; the
violation of male and female workers' rights, in particular migrant workers.
2) Bad pineapple waste and residue management has led to the
development of a plague of “blood-sucking” flies - stomoxys
calcitrans. This plague of flies is causing millions of dollars worth of damage to
livestock around the plantations. The fly sucks the cattle's blood,
giving rise to sharp pains, deep skin lesions, high blood pressure,
debilitation, weight-loss and even death. It has led to a sharp fall in
milk and meat production for livestock farmers in neighbouring
communities.
3) There is indsicriminate use of highly toxic agrochemicals which
pose a threat to human life. Studies by the National University and
the National Water Laboratory of the Water and Sewage Institute have
found concentrations of 1.4 mg/litre of Bromacil in the drinking water
supplies of Siquirres and Guacimo in Limon province. Residues of other
chemicals used in pineapple production such as Diuron and Triademephon
have also been found in water supplies. Bromacil is a component of
“agent orange” which left millions of dead and genetically malformed
from the Vietnam War.
In the face of such serious issues, we cannot remain silent. We would
like to be able to stay the world's leading exporters of top quality
pineapples, because we want development, but not at the cost of
thousands of people's livelihoods and rights as workers or farmers and
not at the cost of our natural resources.
We Costa Ricans have a right to a future in which our land is not
totally degraded by intensive production, a right to farm without being
threatened by pollution and a right for our children to know what
living forests and rivers are like.
The message to workers inside the plantations is that we have to fight
together to get the companies to respect labour and environmental
legislation; people deserve work with dignity and respect. All we ask
is that the rights fought for so hard by so many in this country and
around the world be respected.
We want to make it clear to national and international opinion that we
are not opposed to pineapple production, provided the environmental and
social laws are respected and, above all, human dignity and basic human
rights are respected.
To the industry, we address an appeal to work together to respect the
legislation and corporate responsibility standards. In this way we
would achieve what we want so much – environmentally and socially
friendly production; it is also what consumers of fresh produce want in
Europe and the rest of the world.
In the face of the current problems, and so as to join efforts to
ensure that social and environmental legislation enforced, we have
decided to create the National Coalition of communities affected by
pineapple expansion.
We call on the public authorities to enforce the laws and foster the welfare of all the country's inhabitants.
END THE UNCONTROLLED PINEAPPLE EXPANSION, END POLLUTION, AND END THE VIOLATION OF WORKERS' RIGHTS
Click here to read a second open letter from Nicaraguan migrant
pineapple workers on 'Costa Rica: a country that prides itself on its
laws, but is deeply anti-union'(February 2008)
|